CopperKettle

Hello CopperKettle, welcome to the Dutch Wikipedia! Welkomstbericht in het Nederlands Thank you for participating in this community project. We would like to give you the opportunity to be free and productive. Here are a few directions that might help you: A collection of useful links in English can be found on Help:English. Please use our Sandbox (zandbak) for experimenting. Feel free to add your expertise to Wikipedians by interest, and to use our Babel templates (taalsjablonen) on your user page. Wikipedia has been an ongoing project for several years now. There have been discussions on many issues in the past. Please check the discussion pages (overlegpagina's) if you are in doubt about the contents of a given page. If you want to make a careful start editing in Dutch, try to expand some of our stubs (beginnetjes). Take care when editing someone else's work. Registered users can change the name of an article by using "Titel wijzigen". This method of renaming keeps the history (geschiedenis) of a page intact. Questions about Wikipedia or for help can be asked at the Helpdesk. To sign messages, use four tildes: ~~~~ More information (in Dutch) can be found on our conventions page and the wikiquette page.

MoiraMoira _overleg 31 mei 2010 13:15 (CEST)

Externe links op Cas Oorthuys

Externe link(s)

Beste CopperKettle, De externe link(s) die u heeft geplaatst in een of meer artikelen, waaronder Cas Oorthuys, zijn verwijderd. Wij waarderen uw bijdragen aan Wikipedia. Het streven is echter het aantal externe links op Wikipedia tot een minimum te beperken. Wikipedia is in de eerste plaats een encyclopedie, en geen verzameling van links naar andere websites. We zien relevante encyclopedische informatie liever in de artikelen zelf verwerkt en nodigen u uit hieraan bij te dragen. Als de link die u toevoegde relevante zaken bevat, kunt u die informatie gebruiken in het lemma. We vragen uw begrip hiervoor. Het zonder overleg en argumentatie weer plaatsen van de link(s) kan gezien worden als vandalisme. U kunt links als deze aanmelden bij een van de vele startpagina's en linkpagina's op het internet. Zie ook: Wikipedia:Welkom voor nieuwkomers en Wikipedia:Wanneer extern linken. English version Bijdragen (en/de/fr/alle projecten) / overzicht verwijderde bijdragen CentralAuth Blokkeerlogboek Blokkadelijst Blokkadeverzoek Blokkeer gebruiker Filterlogboek

MoiraMoira _overleg 1 dec 2008 13:13 (CET)

Reelin = Reeline

Dear CopperKettle, I've changed the title of the article requested by you into Reeline as this is more common Dutch. The artcikle itself is stil under construction. Greets, Solejheyen 12 okt 2009 18:30 (CEST)

Thank you, Solejheyen, for an outstanding work! With a virtual handshake, yours truly, --CopperKettle 12 okt 2009 20:49 (CEST)

Hi CopperKettle, about the Reeline article again: I have problems with some other Wikipedians here because of the footnotes. They claim I should not have used those notes in the Dutch article because of copyright, look here: [1]. I think it is mainly you who incorporated those footnotes in the original English text, so could you look at the Dutch text and tell if I had or not the right to copy them or not? Please let the others know as well, on the discussion page of the Dutch article. Thanks. Greets, Solejheyen 6 nov 2009 22:09 (CET)

I'm not sure how the references affect the copyright. O_o. I've notified the folks at EnWiki's project MolBiology. Maybe I'll notify some primary figures engaged in writing molecular articles at EnWiki if there's no reply there. You did a great job at translating! Best regards! --CopperKettle 7 nov 2009 10:12 (CET)

Hello CopperkKettle (they have blocked my account but I'm Solejheyen), how do you do? I am very sorry to say that the Reeline article has been nominated for deletion, see here. It is mainly because of some small translation errors and because they think I have used improper sources (though they are more or less the same as in the English article). Having worked on it for months, I would really regret if the article would be removed. It is mainly you who wanted this article, so do you think can you give your own opinion about it in the discussion? Thanks in advance. Greets, 193.141.132.155 6 jan 2010 15:12 (CET)

• Hi! I'm sorry to hear that! I've saved the translation to a temporary folder at my userpage. I've already asked the nominator to list the problems he sees with the article. I am very grateful for your work... --CopperKettle 6 jan 2010 16:06 (CET)

(I was formerly Solejheyen but have changed my account name) Hi CopperKettle! I think you can throw away this, for a newer version of the article is still there. I made some additions to it on the basis of what you added for example here on the English wiki, yet the former nominator (brimz) keeps on nagging on the discussion page of reeline even about this and I feel like I can no longer talk with him, for he always wants things his own way, for example here. Maybe you could still add something to that discussion? I will be off in the week to come, so I can't. With best wishes, De Wikischim 11 feb 2010 23:31 (CET)

• I feel not very good now, will try to look; Google Translate helps, but I will need to re-read a bit, and reading makes me dizzy now, so sorry if that will take some time. --CopperKettle 12 feb 2010 05:56 (CET)

Nomination (2)

Dear CopperKettle, please look here. I am very sorry to say it but in fact I regret having granted your translation request, because now they not only claim that the article is altogether wrong (which is absolutely untrue even if it has some small errors) but also that it does not have the proper form for a Wikipedia article, because it is a review of some scientific research. The same thing then also applies to your English article of course.

I think you should read the Reeline article as well, and if you see any errors please tell on the discussion page. I am tired of all this. I have worked on this article for months to translate and improve it, with this result.

P.S. I think I will leave the Dutch Wikipedia if they delete the article. It is absolutely unfair what they are doing.

De Wikischim 6 mrt 2010 10:08 (CET)

I am terribly, terribly sorry, Wikischim! I'm barely able to read now, have attacks of nausea and dizziness when I read or type. There's a formation in a cavernous sinus of my brain that looks like meningioma but does not explain the attacks. Don't know when and if I'll be fit for any work on the computer. I hope they will not delete the article. If they demand that every article be written by an expert, they should leave Wikipedia and head for Scholarpedia, not you. Sincere regards, --CopperKettle 6 mrt 2010 17:31 (CET)

OK, thanks. I also sincerely hope you will be better soon and do not have a serious infection. Best regards, De Wikischim 6 mrt 2010 17:36 (CET)

Reeline

Hello CopperKettle. Thanx for the offer to solve the problems on the reelin article. The problem is that there so much translation and interpretation errors that it is very hard for a non-native speaker of the Dutch language to help solving these problems. I appreciate your help, but I think it should be best to start from scratch with this article and avoid as much as possible to litteraly translate the article from en:. Als we should avoid too much incrowd words to keep the article accessible to a broad public and not only to specialists. Specialists usually have access to common information as scientific publications about the topic, while the broad public don't. Best regards, brimz 10 jan 2010 13:16 (CET) Thank you for your view, Brimz! --CopperKettle 9 apr 2010 03:52 (CEST)