Dear Thomas, anonymous edits in our users' spaces are not appreciated on our Wiki. That's the only reason for reverting them. Why don't you address your complaint directly to me who reverted the edits in the first place?. Kind regards, Dolledre overleg 28 feb 2006 02:45 (CET)
- Please note that I didn't do an anonymous edit. As I'm not registered on the Dutch Wiki, I added my name and a link to my user page. I also explained why I had deleted them. I was busy updating all the Wikis at the time accordingly, by running the CheckUsage tool, and when I a couple of hours later noticed that the faulty imiages had been re-inserted I just thought you had reacted "anonymous vandal, I'll restore", so I just did it again, but explained in more detail. And when then NielsF did the same shortly afterwards I wrote him and he wrote me, so now I know the reason why Kamu has this selection of coats of arms, and I'll leave him to sort them out. I wronly assumed that he was one of those "crazy" users who are building their on little Wikis within existing Wikis, filling them with pictures (there are quite a few of those around). Best regards 87.74.12.39 2 mrt 2006 00:50 (CET)Thomas Blomberg
Dear Thomas, thanks for your response. Sorry for deleting your edits. Technically they're still anonymous whether signed as X or not. As far as I can see, Kamu is collecting various version of the same coats and I do believe he's capable of keeping his collection up to date one day.
Like you assumed Kamu was one of those "crazy" users who are building their own little Wikis within existing Wikis, some other bloke Gebruiker:Schaengel89 who launched the quote Ihr seid doch alle "krank" edited on the very same page.
So my revert might have been inspired by the whole of commons and other foreign users who are more eager to consider us Dutch (I’m not even Dutch) as crazy than to get familiar with our local customs or language.
Sorry once again, Dolledre overleg 2 mrt 2006 01:46 (CET)