Help:Helpdesk: verschil tussen versies
Verwijderde inhoud Toegevoegde inhoud
→Tceqli: re |
|||
Regel 156:
:::::::::[[Gebruiker:ErikvanB|ErikvanB]] , does the insertion of the ISO 639 claims also count as sarcasm? Do you decorate articles with "sarcasm" texts? Hopp, hopp, go and fix your mess. [[Speciaal:Bijdragen/85.180.88.69|85.180.88.69]] 12 jun 2017 19:15 (CEST)
::::::::[[Gebruiker:Taketa|Taketa]], the principle is over is when they repeatedly and intentionally undo edits by others which did insert verifiable claims. Why did they revert and re-insert the stuff? And [[Gebruiker:RonaldB]] talking about checkuser, instead of talking about content. "what do you expect them to respond" - I expect any kind of response from people that behave like that. But that is irrelevant. Relevant is to have a verifiable article. [[Speciaal:Bijdragen/85.180.88.69|85.180.88.69]] 12 jun 2017 19:13 (CEST)
:::::::::There were sources on the bottom of the page contradicting your edit. I assume, in good faith, that other people assumed these sources to be correct. I consider this a content dispute, with both parties assuming they are correct. As such, not vandalism. It should be resolved on the talk page. People editing in good faith can easily be convinced by sources and arguments. No need for any other actions than those. We are not in a hurry and everyone wants what is best for the article. Some other might have assumed bad faith as well. However, please all assume good faith and try to solve this via the talk page. Sincerely, [[Gebruiker:Taketa|Taketa]] [[Overleg gebruiker:Taketa|<small>(overleg)</small>]] 12 jun 2017 19:19 (CEST)
| |||