Wikipedia:Hoffelijkheid: verschil tussen versies

{{beheerpagina's}}{{Notendop|Wees vriendelijk in je communicatie met mede-Wikipedianen.}}

{{Verwijzing|WP:HOF}}

<!--

 

There is a case where Wikipedia as a whole is not especially respectful of contributions, since anyone can edit freely. This makes criticism of edits all the more pronounced when it does occur. Many people forget that criticizing an edit is easily conflated with insulting the person who made it — and so they are unnecessarily harsh on the giving end and unnecessarily sensitive on the receiving end. Textual communication on the Internet does not transmit the nuances of verbal conversation, so a small, facetious comment can be easily misinterpreted. What starts with one [[WP:CIV|uncivil]] remark becomes an exchange of those same, during which people are no longer interested in improving articles and instead focus on "triumphing" over the "enemy". This is not what Wikipedia is about.

{{Associations/Wikipedia Bad Things}}

== Voorbeelden ==

'''Kleine voorbeelden''' die bijdragen aan een onhoffelijke omgeving:

 

 

Meer '''serieuze voorbeelden''' zijn onder andere:

 

 

 

Deze manier van communicatie jaagt gebruikers weg, leidt anderen af van belangrijker zaken en maakt de hele gemeenschap zwakker.

<!--

== When and why does it happen? ==

* During an edit war, when people have different opinions, or when there is a conflict over sharing power.

* Sometimes, a particularly impolite user joins the project. This can also aggravate other editors into being impolite themselves.

 

 

In other cases, the offender is doing it on purpose: either to distract the "opponent(s)" from the issue, or simply to drive them away from working on the article or even from the project, or to push them to commit an even greater breach in civility, which might result in ostracism or banning. In those cases, it is far less likely that the offender will have any regrets and apologize.

 

== Management of incivility during the mediation process ==

 

=== Explain incivility ===

The role of the mediator is to promote reasonable discussion between the two disputants. Therefore it is helpful to remove incivility voiced by User A, in rephrasing comments to User B.

 

 

=== Rephrasing flames publicly exchanged before or during the mediation process ===

[[Mediation]] regularly involves disputes in which one party feels injured by the other. The apology is an act that is neither about problem-solving and negotiation, nor is it about arbitration. Rather, it is a form of ritual exchange between both parties, where words are said that allow reconciliation. In [[transformative mediation]], the apology represents an opportunity for acknowledgement that may transform relations.

 

-->

{{Zie ook|Zie ook: [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette]]}}

 

[[Categorie:Wikipedia:Gedragsrichtlijnen|Hoffelijkheid]]